Catecholamine Encumbrance in Enzymatic Creatinine Assays [Brief Communications] <<>>
Written by Saenger, A. K., Lockwood, C., Snozek, C. L., Milz, T. C., Karon, B. S., Scott, M. G., Jaffe, A. S. on August 29, 2009 – 12:00 am -Background: Enzymatic creatinine assays are routinely occupied in clinical laboratories to attend to arrange for more correct estimated glomerular filtration rates and to keep away from a perceived be without of analytical specificity associated with picrate (Jaffe) methods. Anti interferences with the enzymatic creatinine assay, which we well-known in diverse patients on dopamine or dobutamine, prompted our then again search into hindrance of catecholamines with enzymatic methods.
Methods: Spiked solutions of dopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine were added to pooled sera at catecholamine concentrations in keeping with clinically relative dosing. Creatinine was majestic enzymatically on the Roche P-Modular, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics Vitros 350, and Abbott i-STAT. Jaffe methods were performed on the Roche P-Modular and Siemens Dimension RxL. In 10 patients receiving dopamine and/or dobutamine via a venous or arterial virgule we evaluated and compared the compass of in vivo creatinine intrusion in paired serum samples obtained by venipuncture and from indwelling catheters.
Results: All catecholamines caused consequential adverse difficulty with the Roche enzymatic creatinine assay, most unequivocal for dopamine and dobutamine. The Vitros enzymatic assay demonstrated diminish contradictory interferences, and i-STAT enzymatic and Jaffe methods were genuine by the spectre of catecholamines. Meritorious (P < 0.001) differences in creatinine concentrations by Roche enzymatic vs Jaffe methods were observed in venipuncture specimens compared with arterial or venous catheter specimens, suggesting dopamine and dobutamine reversibly adhere to the catheter lumen.
Conclusions: Voiding interferences were complete for Roche enzymatic results in blood samples obtained from indwelling catheters, a spectacle not observed in unnecessary draws. Physicians and laboratorians should be sprightly to the chance of a falsely low creatinine evolve and reevaluate suspicious samples using a method unimpressed by by catecholamines.
<<>>Tags: chemistry, clinic
Posted in Clinical Chemistry |
